IMGpapers 1968–75

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1968–75

'Open letter: For Workers' Campaign Against EEC

Red Weekly No. 88, 13 February 1975 · pp. 3-4 of the scan · 534 words

The scan: rw-no88-feb-13-1975.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 1-3 of 5; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 3 of the scan

RIGH The opening meeting of the "Get Britain Out Campaign' in Bristol just over two weeks ago, which saw local Labour MPs rubbing shoulders with campaign against the EEC, independent of all these political representa tives of the capitalist class.

in the local labour movement calling for such a campaign. So far the response to the letter has been good, and excellent prospects exist for taking this question up throughout the Bristol workers' movement.

OPEN LETTER TO THE LABOUR MOVEMENT We reject the arguments based on the sovereignty of Parliament, the British people and all litte Englander notions. tons Act, the Anti-Terrorist Laws, Housing Finance Act and the continued imprisonment of the Shrewsbury 2 ari rocent attacks emanating From Parliament on the sovereignty" of the working class and trade union. movement also the age of tuss puverty. provide the answer to the present cosis-workerk not only in Britain but also in France, Gormany, Portogal und so on.

fries. We therefore call for a united campaign of socalists, trade anion istr and workers against the BEC aning leaders and Lahoot Mly to join toroes with oight wing Tories. Enoch Powell and the fascist National Front on a unined campaign: Such 1 campaige can only confuse the working class and therefore aid che pro-Micketeers. We call for local and national conferences of crade unorists to begin a campaign amongst the working class to maline a massive NO in the torthcoving referendum: Liberal and right-wing Tory politicians, highlighted the need for a workers' The Bristol IMG has taken the initiative of circulating an Open Letter We, the undersigned, cult for the withdrawal of Britain from the EBC.

The Industrial RelaThe alleged Golden Age of Brilich Imperialism was The working class morement alone can The EBC is not in the interests of the workers of any of these coanWe peject attempts by certain trade IS Against the Common Market - fine.

But what weapons should the workers movement fight with? The chauvinism of reactionary groups like the National Front labovel, or international working class solidarity (below)?

TRAVAILUAE TEE DES TRUSTS

page 4 of the scan

*Ampung um)

MERSAHE DURESNRUR SEE on paredaad yer pur sassasol o epe sap Supase Supguo Conapaiad *yaa e IZ3 punose jo salta oul m pue pu sava sia lo emat?

Tрn4 pue SETrainuo MO DE E IR YORN Z Aepune "Aamon jo ouabo a pauno oe sus 11100 3511U ** Nuenes s ol sparT. ano 5! e pa uen sog pere aogod pesods ang jo BETANI daa Anpunes Europ ase uopuo y un sdinoi6 SANS asHod paD bị Ko sprodxo tenenu per (Ig teunN:

Sur pépmos te cun tee cous sledu sut to a1 Fune трав совет в SOOgOS ino padda sem Joistun Katu aares Sae pan pure amn auros 0 pur 'staumm Sursuns spuopnas Buns masr spananog o41 ws) poulssap suraoja are sarasfod ouu e u ale sulojas t tusendn umand danesar og Aeg dopesgconen до nampous sans posepr pur conesuadurco Iano **********» HUSAIL CULPAE REALSSEILAHUS opo ay jo sopaa e se sacios pae Apostsip e aunãas aup aaed sains ese gno spurs amo betama at Зааов вя oт pue ungandod agt unser 40g HH-IDE ISIMU AE MELUEULO DuT Ao Bunis UFColO SLOSS

← Labour's Creation of Terror ActBehind the Tory leadership crisis →

Something wrong on this page?