IMGpapers 1968–75

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1968–75

'LEFT' ALLIES

Red Weekly No. 116, 11 September 1975 · pp. 3-4 of the scan · 179 words

The scan: rw-no116-sep-11-1975.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 5-6 of 6; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 3 of the scan

The final conclusion that the Benn letter fails to draw is the need for the removal of Wilson and his allies from their positions of leadership. The price that the labour movement has to pay for that leadership is there for all to see - swelling unemployment, lowering living standards, decaying social services, the deliberate flouting of the decisions of the labour movement's organisations, and a reactionary foreign policy Labour MP Sid Bidwell, speaking about Benn's appeal to keep per sonalities out of the argument, commented: "There are those who are collectively responsible for turning away from the Manifesto, and this means that the battle for the removal of the right-wing leadership must be intensified.' Bidwell is absolutely correct on this matter. There can be no serious opposition to the anti-working class policies of Wilson and company that does not include the fight for their removal. If Benn really really wants to defeat the right-wing policies of the Government, he should resign forthwith and help to lead that essential fight.

page 4 of the scan

red weekly 11 september 19/5

← WILSON-HEALEY AXISBRITISH TROOPS ACT AS COVER FOR LOYALIST SQUADS →

Something wrong on this page?